USCR-APOLOGY-2009
Apology Resolution, Cluster B
United States Congressional Apology to Native Peoples — close reading in relation to Whereas. A formal apology unfolds through dense legal language, acknowledging “official depredations” while embedding disclaimers that limit accountability and foreclose reparative action.
- Date
- 2009
- Medium
- Printed Congressional resolution; legislative text
- Collection
- U.S. Congressional Record; digitized federal archive
- Catalog
- USCR-APOLOGY-2009
Archival document
U.S. Congressional apology to Native peoples (digitized resolution)
Open PDF in a new tab · Some browsers may not render PDFs inline; use the link if the viewer is blank.
Digitized facsimile of the joint resolution text; open in a new tab if the embedded viewer does not load.
Selected excerpt
“Whereas the United States, acting through the Congress… recognizes the special legal and political relationship Indian tribes have with the United States…” “…nothing in this Joint Resolution… authorizes or supports any claim against the United States…”
Close reading
The resolution is structured through a series of “Whereas” clauses, a form that accumulates acknowledgment without arriving at action. The repetition creates the illusion of movement, each clause layering harm upon harm, yet the document ultimately redirects this momentum into legal closure. Language such as “recognizes” and “acknowledges” gestures toward accountability while remaining non-performative. It names violence without materially addressing it.
Synthesis
Why this pairing; what juxtaposition reveals
Why this pairing
Formal government “Whereas” prose and Long Soldier’s broken lines show the same text as both closure and raw material for resistance.
What juxtaposition reveals
The side-by-side view makes form visible: continuous legislative syntax versus spacing, interruption, and feeling-as-language.
What the archive alone cannot show
The state document cannot show what it costs to read it; the poem insists on embodied response where the record claims neutrality.